Williams v. Williams
Mississippi Supreme Court
Error to the probate court of Chickasaw county. Owen, J. The plaintiff in error assigned the following errors : ,1st. The court erred in the restatement of the second annual, and final account, in this : 1st. That it struck out and disallowed the sum of $1,354 by administrator paid to Samuel 0. Williams for his probated claim, as is shown by voucher No. 7 to said account. 2d.
Read the full summary
Error to the probate court of Chickasaw county. Owen, J. The plaintiff in error assigned the following errors : ,1st. The court erred in the restatement of the second annual, and final account, in this : 1st. That it struck out and disallowed the sum of $1,354 by administrator paid to Samuel 0. Williams for his probated claim, as is shown by voucher No. 7 to said account. 2d. The court erred in charging the administrator for so much good money, the sum of nine hundred dollars, which was contemplated to be paid in confederate money, as per charge made against himself for the hire of negro. 3d.…
1Opinion of the Court
Tarbell, J.:
This case comes to this court by appeal from the probate court of Chickasaw county upon exceptions to final account and decree in the settlement of the estate of Esther Williams, deceased. Several causes of error are assigned, as follows:
1st. The court erred in striking out find disallowing the sum of $1,354 by administrator paid to Samuel C. Williams for his probated claim, as is shown by voucher No. 7 to said account.
2d. The court erred in charging the administrator for so much good money, the sum of nine hundred dollars, which was contemplated to be paid in Confederate money as…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Moffatt v. LoughridgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1875