Wrighten v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.
Eddie Wrighten appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child. Punishment was enhanced because of two prior felony convictions, and assessed at life imprisonment. Wrighten contends that the trial court committed fundamental error by assuming an element of the offense in the court’s charge, and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in violation of state and federal constitutional provisions. We overrule both contentions and affirm the judgment.
The application paragraph of the court’s charge to the jury provided:
If you find and and (sic)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Grady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brasher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Jayroe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986