Vigoureux v. Murphy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, in the Fourth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Morrison, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 2, Thornton, P. J.:
The plaintiff (appellant here) brought this action to recover the possession of land in the City and County of San Francisco, which he described as one parcel by metes and bounds, concluding with these words: “ Being lots numbers 463, 464, 465, 466, as laid down on Gift Map No. 2, on file in the Recorder’s office of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California.” The complaint was in the usual form adopted in this State for the recovery of possession of real property.
The defendant answered, denying all the material allegations of the complaint…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Power v. LarabeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Bechtel v. WierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Marston v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Nevada Nickel Syndicate, Ltd. v. National Nickel Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1900
- Thompson v. BrowneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.