Gunnels v. Atcheson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
PITTS, Chief Justice.
From a summary judgment in behalf of appellees, denying appellant any recovery against them for the alleged balance of $3,387.59 due him for drilling and equipping an irrigation water well and for foreclosure of his mechanic’s and materialmen’s lien against the designated property, an appeal has been perfected. Appellant, J. W. ■Gunnels, sued appellees, Carl Atcheson and wife, Bettie Ruth Atcheson, Ernestine Atcheson, a widow, Thelma Atcheson, a feme sole, Vivian Atcheson, a feme sole, and Jack H. Mills, for the said balance of his alleged account and foreclosure of lien…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kaufman v. BlackmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Schroeder v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Loud v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marshall v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Sullivan v. Sisters of St. Francis of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Smith v. Muckleroy EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Butler v. Davy Crockett Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Tyson v. ASSOCIATES INVESTMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.