Legal Opinion

Sloan v. Sprouse

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 26, 1998No. O 98-0880PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1255 ORDER REMANDING MATTER TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF SEQUOYAH COUNTY FOR FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

¶ 1 On July 31, 1998, Petitioner, by and through counsel, filed an application for a writ of mandamus directing the District Court of Sequoyah County, Case No. CV-98-469, to rescind its order of July 22, 1998, sealing the Affidavit for Search Warrant. On July 27, 1998, Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the District Court which was denied in an order filed August 3, 1998.

¶ 2 Petitioner contends that every day he is denied the Affidavit for Search Warrant his ability…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. De Graff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. In Re Search Warrants Issued August 29, 1994District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
  4. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. In re Eyecare Physicians of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dubbs Ex Rel. Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. Dodson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Dodson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. No. 01-5098Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API