Legal Opinion

Caulkins v. Bolton

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1884Published

Appeal from a judgment, entered upon tbe trial of tliis action by the court without a jury'.

1Opinion of the Court

Learned, P. J.:

This is an action of interpleader brought by a mortgagor to-determine to whom he may pay the mortgage.

Lucinda Comstock, executrix of Zara Comstock, deceased , loaned money of the estate to the plaintiff and took this bond and mortgage in her own name, not as executrix. She was, under the will, entitled to the use of all the property of Zara Comstock during her natural life for her support, and also entitled, to use any portion of the principal, if necessary, for her support, and of this she was to be the sole judge.

Lucinda Comstock died. "Letters of administration on her estate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Walton v. WaltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Luers v. BrungesNew York Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API