Legal Opinion
State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 9, 1969PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
On February 19, 1968, defendant was convicted by jury trial of the crime of larceny in a building under ORS 164.820. Defendant appeals from .this conviction on two grounds:(1) That defendant was not advised of his right to have court-appointed counsel present during his interrogation, as required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 86 S Ct 1602, 16 L Ed2d 694 (1966).(2) That defendant’s waiver of his constitutional rights and his oral confession were involuntary.
On November 18, 1967, defendant purportedly committed larceny in the Carnation Icecreamland store in the Raleigh Hills Shopping…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. CoronaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
- State v. LyonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.