Legal Opinion
Neville v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided June 13, 1923No. 345-3096PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
GALLAGHER, P. J.
The Supreme Court, in pursuance of the opinion of this court, and upon the recommendation therein made, heretofore entered an order reversing the judgment'of the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals in this case and remanding the cause to the district court for a new trial. 244 S. W. 980. Defendant in error, in due time, filed a motion for rehearing, and same is now before us for consideration.
The parties will be designated herein' as in the trial court. The facts are fully stated in our former opinion. We deem it sufficient for present purposes…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- International-Great Northern R. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Pullman Co. v. DudleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1943