Legal Opinion
Saloshin v. Houle
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 4, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
It is sought by the transfer of the case to have it here determined what effect the plaintiff’s acceptance of compensation in New York had upon the action. The answer depends, first, upon the policy of comity in enforcing the laws of other states, and second, if comity may be invoked, upon the New York law relating to and regulating compensation.
As the record is understood, the plaintiff as the decedent’s widow, is the sole beneficiary of the action under P. L., c. 302, s. 14, ii. It does not appear that there are minor or dependent children to share with her in any recovery. However the New…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. Louis Padula Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Travelers Insurance v. Brass Goods Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Shapleigh v. MierSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Dumas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Bradford Elec. Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Choate v. RansomNevada Supreme Court · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.