Van Dyck v. Van Dyck

Plaintiff wife appeals a final judgment of divorce and assigns as error the amount of permanent alimony awarded.

Having examined the briefs and listened to the arguments of the parties, no clear abuse of the trial judge’s discretion has been shown. We therefore affirm. Beaty v. Beaty, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 54, Lasseter v. Lasseter, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 455 and Farr v. Farr, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 890.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and REED, JJ., concur.