Legal Opinion

People v. Parker

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 2006No. B182681PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERREN, J.

Joseph Milton Parker appeals from the order denying his petition for a certificate of rehabilitation and pardon. (Pen. Code, § 4852.01 et seq.) Parker, an Arizona resident, contends that the statute’s five-year California residency requirement violates his constitutional right to travel by providing for disparate treatment of resident and nonresident ex-felons.

We conclude that the residency requirement does not burden Parker’s constitutional right to travel. California has a legitimate and substantial governmental interest in requiring five years of residency in order to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Miller, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Nathan Daniel Olsen v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2024
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API