People v. Parker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERREN, J.
Joseph Milton Parker appeals from the order denying his petition for a certificate of rehabilitation and pardon. (Pen. Code, § 4852.01 et seq.) Parker, an Arizona resident, contends that the statute’s five-year California residency requirement violates his constitutional right to travel by providing for disparate treatment of resident and nonresident ex-felons.
We conclude that the residency requirement does not burden Parker’s constitutional right to travel. California has a legitimate and substantial governmental interest in requiring five years of residency in order to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Miller, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Nathan Daniel Olsen v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2024
- People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018