Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Colgan Air, Inc. v. West Virginia Human Rights Commission

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 2007No. 33355Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAlbright, Justice

(Filed November 21, 2007)

I agree with the majority that Mr. Khan should not be reinstated to a pilot position based upon his performance on the flight proficiency testing, governed by federal FAA standards. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that Mr. Khan is not entitled to any remedy for the harassment he endured.

The majority premises its holding upon its judgment that knowledge of the harassment was not attributable to management. The procedure established by Colgan Air for the reporting of harassment, reviewed by Mr. Khan when he received training, instructed that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Noviello v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Donna M. Rhodes v. Illinois Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Hanlon v. ChambersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Heitzman v. Monmouth CountyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API