Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Blowstein

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 29, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henderson, S.

This application by the corporate guardian of the estate of decedent’s infant son and sole distributee for a determination as to whether or not a certain automobile valued at $300 and owned by the decedent at the time of his death, is now the property of such son, by virtue of the provisions of section 200 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, is opposed by the same trust company in its capacity as administrator of decedent’s estate because of a possible insolvency of the estate.

The decedent was a doctor of medicine and used the automobile as a pleasure car and in the pursuit of his…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BenjaminNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  2. In re the Estate of MackenzieNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of SennNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of MancinelliNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  5. In re the Estate of WinklerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API