Legal Opinion

Roy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1932No. 14941Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

— Attached to appellant’s motion for rehearing is an application to the trial judge for an extension of time in which to file bills of exception to October 16, 1931, and an order which granted such extension. These documents were not in the transcript when the1 original opinion was prepared. The bills were in fact not filed until October 19, 1931. There appears in the motion for rehearing an effort to excuse appellant for the delayed filing. The sufficiency of the excuse is questionable, but it is not necessary to consider that point.

The motion for new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fuston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Leago v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API