Legal Opinion
People v. Stipo
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 2011No. B218512PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
A subscriber has no expectation of privacy in the subscriber information he supplies to his Internet provider. Therefore, his challenge to a warrant requiring his Internet provider to identify him through his Internet Protocol. (IP) address has no merit.
*667Vincent Michael Stipo appeals a judgment following his no contest pleas to wiretapping (Pen. Code, § 631, subd. (a)) and unlawfully accessing computer information (Pen. Code, § 502, subd. (c)(2)).1 The trial court denied Stipo’s motions to suppress evidence that the police obtained in two searches. We conclude, among other…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Badry CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Kuhn CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Martin CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021