Legal Opinion

York v. Davidson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Josephine : Hiero K. Hanna, Judge. Bill by Henry York against O. T. Davidson and others to enjoin the operation of defendants’ mine. From a decree granting the injunction, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolvbrton

Defendants are engaged in placer mining by the hydraulic system in Taylor’s Gulch, a tributary of a stream which traverses a portion of plaintiff’s land, known as “Garris Creek’’; the necessary water, aside from that contained in the gulch, being carried to it from Rocky Greek, Miners’ Creek, and Carris Creek by means of ditches. The two creeks first named also discharge into Garris Greek, and all these streams, including Miller Creek, flow more or less through a decomposed granite formation. The point of operation is located two miles above the lands of the plaintiff, and at an elevation of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. North Bloomfield Gravel Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1892
  2. United States v. LawrenceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railroad v. ReaganTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Brown v. Gold Coin Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Provolt v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API