Legal Opinion
Petkevich v. MTA
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 6, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants MTA and New York City Transit Authority appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hinds-Radix, J.), dated February 1, 2006, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants MTA and New York City Transit Authority is granted.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weiner v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Clinger v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Farber v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Calero v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Genovese v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harris v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Doe v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2008