Legal Opinion

Davis v. Doyle

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 20, 1959No. 5-1843PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

The question for decision is: Can appellant, Mitchell Davis, lawfully hold the office of Mayor of Hoxie and act as manager of the Hoxie Waterworks and Sewer System at the same time and draw salaries from both sources'?

The facts are not in dispute. Davis has served as Mayor continuously since 1949 and has drawn a salary in that capacity. Prior to 1949 Hoxie had a waterworks system and paid someone to service it, but it seems that there was no separate office of manager. In 1954 the City completed a sewer system, joined with the waterworks system, and created the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tappan v. Helena Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Revis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. Rogers v. SangsterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Kindricks v. MachinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thompson v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2009
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2004
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2003
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API