Legal Opinion

Shepard v. Newton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 11, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The single contention of the appellant underlying both of these appeals is that the trust of the residue under the will of O. Atherton Shepard, late of Brookline, is void for indefiniteness.

The will as amplified by a codicil places the entire residue, real and personal, in trust for these purposes: "The net income from said residue is to be separated into three parts, for convenience designated as funds A, B and C. Divisions of this income shall be made by my trustees and their division shall not be questioned except in case of fraud.” Fund A is to be paid to the testator’s widow and at her…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Olliffe v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Nichols v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Lewis v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Boynton v. TarbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Minot v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Burlingham v. WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API