Legal Opinion

Pacific Mail S. S. Co. v. Beneby

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1918No. 3166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Canal Zone; William H. Jackson, Judge. Action by Wilfred Beneby against the Pacific Mail Steamship Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge.

[1] The writ of error is not subject to be dismissed on the ground that the value in controversy does not exceed $1,000, within the meaning of the act giving this court jurisdiction to review final judgments and decrees of the District Court of the Canal Zone (10 Comp. Stat. Anno. 1916, § 10045), as the aggregate of the amounts of the judgment in favor of the plaintiff and of the counterclaim made by the defendant and disallowed exceeds $1,000.

[2] The plaintiff (the defendant in error), while a member of one of several gangs of workmen engaged in loading cargo on board a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Panama R. v. RockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
  2. Heyer v. Reardon Smith Line, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API