Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Hanes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 26, 1926No. 16391Published

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. “There is no presumption of law that a minor over fourteen years of age, who applies for a position involving dangerous service, is aware of the danger and needs no instruction.” Atlanta & West Point R. Co. v. Smith, 94 Ga. 107 (20 S. E. 763).

2. In a suit by a minor, seventeen years of age, against his employer, to recover for personal injuries received while engaged in working in close proximity to a revolving circular saw, where it was alleged that the minor was feeble-minded and possessed a mental capacity below that of the average boy fourteen years of age, and could not appreciate the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Betts Co. v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. McIntyre v. Empire Printing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Girvin v. Georgia Veneer & Package Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API