Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1996No. 93-871Published

1Opinion of the Court

On Application for Termination of Probation.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by respondent, Fuad B. Nasrallah, a.k.a. Fuad Bahige Nasrallah, of an application for termination of probation.

*1405The court coming now to consider its order of September 8, 1993, in which respondent was suspended from the practice of law for two years, with the suspension stayed and respondent placed on probation on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(9).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court, effective October 7,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. NasrallahOhio Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API