Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Kahan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1965Published

1Dissent

Burke, J. (dissenting).

Respondents in these cases have been convicted under section 484-h of the Penal Law of .selling allegedly obscene .pictures and publications to minors under 18 years of age. 'These are what are commonly known as “ girlie ” magazines. Under the decisions of the United States Supreme Court and of this court they would not be classified as obscene in the case of adults (Larkin v. Putnam’s Sons, 14 N Y 2d 399; People v. Revo, 15 N Y 2d 743, and cases cited). The question here is whether these publications can be held *315to have been obscene when sold to 'children younger than…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Butler v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Skenandoa Rayon Corp. v. Halifax Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API