Legal Opinion

Hahn v. Taefi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this medical malpractice action, we are told that the complaint alleges that defendant negligently performed upon plaintiff Margaret Hahn a surgical procedure known as a tuboplasty, the purpose of which was to reverse her prior tubal ligation. It is said that as a result of the operation, Margaret Hahn was rendered permanently sterile. Plaintiffs appeal from that part of an order which struck from their bill of particulars the word "sterility” as a separately stated injury.

The sparse stipulated record submitted by the parties contains…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Endresz v. FriedbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Butler v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Catherwood v. American Sterilizer Co.New York Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Villa v. MarcianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Slaughter v. St. Anthony Community HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Anderson v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. LaVista v. Huntington HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API