Hahn v. Taefi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this medical malpractice action, we are told that the complaint alleges that defendant negligently performed upon plaintiff Margaret Hahn a surgical procedure known as a tuboplasty, the purpose of which was to reverse her prior tubal ligation. It is said that as a result of the operation, Margaret Hahn was rendered permanently sterile. Plaintiffs appeal from that part of an order which struck from their bill of particulars the word "sterility” as a separately stated injury.
The sparse stipulated record submitted by the parties contains…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Endresz v. FriedbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Butler v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- Catherwood v. American Sterilizer Co.New York Supreme Court · 1986
- Villa v. MarcianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Slaughter v. St. Anthony Community HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Anderson v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- LaVista v. Huntington HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998