Robert Neises Construction Corp. v. Grand Innovations, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Robert Neises Construction Corporation ("Neises") appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Kentland Bank ("Kentland") in this foreclosure action. Neises presents the following issues for our review:
1. Whether the trial court erred when it concluded that Kentland's expenditures to protect the subject real estate from damage pending the foreclosure ("preservation expenses") should take priority over Neises' and others' mechanic's liens.
2. Whether the trial court erred when it did not assign Neises' mechanic's lien a higher priority…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ward v. YarnelleIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Bules v. Marshall CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Miller v. Jackson TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Shelter Insurance Co. v. WoolemsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Porter v. Bankers Trust Co. of CaliforniaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City Savings Bank v. Eby Construction, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Edgerock Development, LLC v. C.H. Garmong & Son IncIndiana Supreme Court · 2025
- Momar, Inc. v. Watcon, Inc. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016