Legal Opinion

Herd v. Ingle

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1986No. 14238PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs received a judgment against defendants for $10,385.19. They attempted to collect the amount awarded through garnishing a bank account of defendants William R. Ingle and Billy Ingle at Citizens Bank of Ava. Claiming a right of “set off” because of a promissory note held by the bank and signed by William R. Ingle and Netta Ingle, the bank denied that it was obligated to pay under the garnishment. This contention was upheld by the trial court. Plaintiffs appeal.

A bank’s right to set-off is a well established principle. The relationship of a bank and its depositor…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adelstein v. Jefferson Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Brown v. Maguire's Real Estate AgencySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Smith v. American Bank & Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Kaw Valley State Bank & Trust v. Commercial Bank of Liberty, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Prudential Trust Co. v. Merchants' Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bremen Bank and Trust Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. First Bank of Whiting v. Samocki Bros. Trucking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Retha D. Frierson v. United Farm Agency, Inc., the Merchants Bank, Intervenor Below. Retha D. Frierson v. United Farm Agency, Inc., the Merchants BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  4. Wenneker v. Physicians Multispecialty Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Martens v. Hadley Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API