Legal Opinion
Hare v. Molyneaux
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 2, 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered April 10, 1991 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Planning Board of the City of Kingston granting a special permit to respondent Rural Ulster Preservation Company.
Respondent Rural Ulster Preservation Company (hereinafter RUPCO) is the owner of a multiunit apartment building in the City of Kingston, Ulster County, which is located within the Rondout Historic District. RUPCO sought the necessary approvals to rehabilitate the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shawangunk Mountain Environmental Ass'n v. Planning Board of the Town of GardinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- West Branch Conservation Ass'n v. Planning Board of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Weiss v. Planning BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cathedral Church of Saint John Divine v. Dormitory AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Teich v. BuchheitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Steele v. Town of Salem Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Watch Hill Homeowners Ass'n v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- MATTER OF MILLER v. City of LockportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.