Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Peters

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 5, 1946PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAPMAN, C. J.:

Mary T. Brooks, joined by her husband, Clifford H. Brooks, in the first count of her second amended declaration, alleged in part, that on June 30, 1944, and for several months prior thereto, the relation of tenant and landlord existed between them and the defendant, Hugh Peters; that they occupied Apartment No. 3 situated in the City of Miami at 7540 N.E. 2nd Street; that the defendant, Hugh Peters, prior to May, 1944, had supplied hot water to all of his tenants occupying his apartment building aforesaid; that the method of heating was by a bottled gas heater attached to a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gobrecht v. BeckwithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Moore v. LanierSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Simms v. KennedySupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Butler v. ManeySupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Mansell v. HandsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Mansur v. EubanksSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Alvarez v. DeAguirreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Bennett v. MattisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—Report No. 09-01Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  5. Propper v. KesnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API