Ayers Asphalt & Paving Co. v. Hill
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Appeal from Civil District Court, Division “B.”
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This was a suit to enforce payment of a local assessment for street paving'. The paving was done by the plaintiff corporation under a contract with the City of New Orleans which was authorized by an ordinance of said City adoptecj in accordance with the provisions of Act 73 of 1876, and of Act 119 of 1886 as amended by Act 142 of 1894.
The defense is that plaintiff has forfeited its right to enforce its contract with the City of New Orleans, or to recover the value of the work performed, either of the City of New Orleans, or of any property owner, for the reason that the plaintiff contractor…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Louisiana v. PilsburySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hoboken v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- State v. De HartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Otoe County v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.