People v. Romero
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
Following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), defendant Carlos Martin Romero pleaded guilty to possession for sale of a controlled substance. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378.)
The trial court sentenced defendant to state prison and, as pertinent, imposed a $1,000 restitution fine.
Defendant appeals, contending (1) his motion to suppress was erroneously denied, and (2) the trial court erroneously imposed the restitution fine.
We shall affirm the judgment.
I
Motion to Suppress
When law enforcement officers searched defendant’s mobile home…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. CamarellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. DeFranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. Delp CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. DuenasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Poindexter CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020