Legal Opinion

People v. Romero

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1996No. C021099PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

Following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), defendant Carlos Martin Romero pleaded guilty to possession for sale of a controlled substance. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378.)

The trial court sentenced defendant to state prison and, as pertinent, imposed a $1,000 restitution fine.

Defendant appeals, contending (1) his motion to suppress was erroneously denied, and (2) the trial court erroneously imposed the restitution fine.

We shall affirm the judgment.

I

Motion to Suppress

When law enforcement officers searched defendant’s mobile home…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. People v. CamarellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. DeFranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. Delp CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. DuenasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Poindexter CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API