Legal Opinion

Progressive Specialty Insurance v. Alexis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the petition which was to direct disclosure in aid of arbitration pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c), as the petitioner failed to demonstrate that “extraordinary circumstances” existed such that this relief would be absolutely necessary for the protection of its rights (De Sapio v Kohlmeyer, 35 NY2d 402, 406 [1974] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Morris, 83 AD3d 709, 710 [2011]; Matter of Travelers *934Indem. Co. v United Diagnostic Imaging, P.C., 73 AD3d 791, 791-792 [2010]). Angiolillo, J.E, Dickerson, Lott…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Sapio v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. United Diagnostic Imaging, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Government Employees Insurance v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPAN v. KALINA, RICHARDAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. AXA Equitable Life Insurance v. KalinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. AXA Equitable Life Insurance v. KalinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. (Twomey)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. Weisz v. WeiszNew York Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API