Legal Opinion

State v. Perez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 18, 2001No. 3D00-3252PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 110 S.Ct. 1684, 109 L.Ed.2d 85 (1990)(concluding that the defendant, an overnight guest, had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the home in which he was staying and thus had fourth amendment standing to challenge a police intrusion into that home); Murray v. United States, 487 U.S. 533, 108 S.Ct. 2529, 101 L.Ed.2d 472 (1988)(concluding a search pursuant to a warrant was not an independent search if the agents’ decision to seek the warrant was prompted by what they had seen during the initial entry, or if information obtained during that entry…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Potts v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Shannon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. GelinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API