Legal Opinion
Naftilos Painting & Sandblasting, Inc. v. Hartnett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 21, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, P. J.
Proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initi*701ated in this court pursuant to Labor Law §§ 200 and 220-b) to review two determinations of respondent which, inter alia, found that petitioners failed to pay prevailing wage and wage supplements.
In December 1984, Penn-Crete Construction Corporation contracted with the Department of Transportation (hereinafter DOT) to rehabilitate bridges on Interstate Routes 84 and 684 in Putnam and Westchester Counties. Pursuant to Labor Law § 220 (1), the contract with DOT required that employees on the project be paid the prevailing wage in the locality of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. Public Sevice CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Claim of Burkholder v. Burkholder Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Naftilos Painting & Sandblasting, Inc. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Langhorne v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Municipal Housing Authority v. DuganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Oliver v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992