Legal Opinion
Shannon v. Pay 'N Save Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1985No. 51117-9Published
1Opinion of the Court
104 Wn.2d 722 (1985)
709 P.2d 799
IRIS SHANNON, Respondent,
v.
PAY 'N SAVE CORPORATION, Appellant.
No. 51117-9.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
November 21, 1985.
Ryan, Swanson, Hendel & Cleveland, by Michael R. Rayton and Thao Tiedt, for appellant.
Salter, McKeehen & Rabine, by James R.B. Salter and Carleton H.A. Taber, for respondent.
DURHAM, J.
Pay 'n Save Corporation appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding it liable, pursuant to RCW 49.60, for discriminating against Iris Shannon in employment because of her gender. Pay 'n Save contends that the trial court erred by: (1)…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.