Legal Opinion
Ford v. Warden FMC Rochester
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 19, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01499Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANCIS FORD, : No. 3:24-CV-1499 Petitioner : ; (Judge Munley) V. : WARDEN FMC ROCHESTER, ' Respondent : SSNS ee to circa. eee Petitioner Francis Ford initiated the above-captioned action by filing a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He alleges that the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is illegally requiring him to make excessively high restitution payments under the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP). For the following reasons, the court will dismiss Ford’s Section…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Phillip B. Moscato 08126-050 v. Federal Bureau of Prisons L.S.C.I. Allenwood, Phillip B. MoscatoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.