Malcolm v. Esposito

By Judge Michael P. McWeeny

This matter came before the Court on the Defendants’ Objection to Jurisdiction. Both parties submitted briefs prior to the November 14, 2003, hearing. At the conclusion of oral argument, the Court took this matter under advisement.. The Court has fully considered the briefs submitted as well as the oral arguments of both parties and, for the reasons set forth below, the Court holds that it does have in personam jurisdiction over the Defendants.

Facts

This case arises out of a dispute involving an Internet transaction. The facts relevant to the jurisdictional issue are…