Legal Opinion

Kjosnes v. Gray

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 29, 1907No. Nos. 15,457—(151)Published

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $3,000 for personal injuries. The case was tried before Holt, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $400. From an order denying his motion for judgment in favor of the defendant notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant, in which plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

The facts, in brief, are as follows: Defendant, at the time of the accident complained of, was operating a stone quarry at the city of Red Wing, and employed in and about the work a large number of men in blasting and loosening rock, removing the same by means of dump cars, and delivering it to the railway company for use on its roadbed.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Maries v. JamesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Bailey v. SwallowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Peterson v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API