Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided May 14, 2025No. 4:23-cv-00967Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION MAURICE JACKSON PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 4:23-CV-00967-BSM ARKANSAS GAME AND FISH COMMISSION DEFENDANT ORDER The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 36] is granted and Maurice Jackson’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND The undisputed facts as set forth in Jackson’s Response to the Commission’s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (SUMF), Doc. No. 39, are as follows. The Commission is an agency of the state of Arkansas. Id. ¶ 1. Its board hires a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.