Argus Real Estate, Inc. v. E-470 Public Highway Authority
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Kourlis
The majority holds that section 15 — 11— 1106(2), C.R.S. (2004), does not permit Argus to file a statutory reformation claim in a subsequent judicial proceeding because of the operation of the doctrine of claim preclusion. Because I read the plain language of the statute as creating an exception to that doctrine, I respectfully dissent.
At issue is a 1990 real estate agreement whereby the E-470 Highway Authority (“Authority”) agreed to purchase the outer parcels of Britton’s land. Britton agreed, upon closing, to donate the interior parcel “for the purpose of constructing the Public Highway.”…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Charnes v. BoomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- City & County of Denver v. Block 173 AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. SaddorisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Michaelson v. MichaelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.