Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dawson v. Olson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1972No. 10865Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McFADDEN, Justice, joined by SCOGGIN, District Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I concur in that portion of the majority opinion which sustains the summary judgment granted in favor of the defendant Department of Highways, State of Idaho. However, I dissent from that portion of the opinion vacating the district court’s order granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

The majority opinion recognizes that Mrs. Dawson was negligent per se in failing to stop at the stop-sign line as required by statute, I.C. § 49-751(d), and tacitly, at least, recognizes she was also in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sun Cab Company, Inc. v. CusickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Bale v. PerrymanIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Coughran v. HickoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Foster v. ThomasIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Davis v. Brooks Transportation CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API