Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Morrow

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 29, 1939No. 32,093PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

At about 1:30 a. m. February 2, 1936, as one Walker was towing plaintiff’s coupé north on highway No. 22, running from Mapleton to Mankato, in passing through the hamlet of Beauford, the rear left fender of a car driven by one Morrow coming out of the creamery, located on the west side of No. 22 and, turning south thereon, came in contact with the rear left fender of plaintiff’s coupé. The impact caused both Morrow and Walker to turn to their right and stop to investigate the damage done. It was ascertained that little or no damage occurred to either car, and the parties…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Descombaz v. KlockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Kassela v. HosethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Singer, Admrx. v. MessinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Fortman v. McBrideSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. Dragotis v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Nash Finch Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Hoeffner v. University of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  3. Henry v. HallquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. LeMire v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. LeMire v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API