Legal Opinion

Acton v. Shultz

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 7, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Magie, Chancellor.

This is a demurrer to a bill for lack of equity.

The purpose of the bill is to obtain a decree against certain persons, interested in the estate of John W. Shultz, deceased, requiring them to pay a bond, given by Edward Shoemaker on February 27th, 1871, to one Sumerill, the administrator of Samuel Humphreys, deceased, conditioned for the payment of $211.66 at the death of Elizabeth, the widow of Samuel Humphreys, with interest. It states that Shoemaker, on March 4th, 1874, conveyed to John W. Shultz certain land on which Shoemaker had given a mortgage to secure said bond, and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meyer v. SupinskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  2. Wootton v. PollockNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API