Legal Opinion

American Hoechst Corp. v. Carr

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 9, 1993No. 92-128-M.PPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY, Justice.

This case came before us on the petition of the employer, American Hoechst Corp. (American), for writ of certiorari. The employer seeks review' of a decree of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Court 1 that reversed a trial judge’s decision that the employee, Susan Carr (Carr), was no longer disabled in total or in part from the effects of an occupational disease. We affirm.

Carr was employed by American as a senior laboratory technician. On March 10, 1980, she was diagnosed as suffering from berylliosis, a lung disease that severely reduces one’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davol, Inc. v. AguiarSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  2. Mulcahey v. New England Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  3. C.D. Burnes Co. v. GuilbaultSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  4. Grimes Box Co., Inc. v. MiguelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrouillardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  2. Poisson v. Comtec Information Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  3. Rocha v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API