Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Union Entities
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1996No. 95-3249, 95-3251 to 95-3253PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DIANA E. MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants claim that the district court 1 erroneously reversed the bankruptcy court’s decisions denying appellee,, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), leave to file a second amended proof of claim and confirming a reorganization plan. The appellants are Be-Mae Transport Company, Inc. (Be-Mac), the debtor;' the Plan Committee, supervisor of Be-Mac’s activities; and the Union- Entities, a creditor consisting of sever-al unions and trust funds that represent many, of- Be-Mac’s current employees and over 700 former employees. The FDIC is a Be-Mac…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Long v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Long and Wife v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- In the Matter of Gerald Lewis Tarnow, Debtor. Appeal of Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Enterprise Bank v. Gustave J. Saettele Laura Saettele, Landmark Bank of St. Charles County v. Gustave J. Saettele Laura SaetteleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Be-Mac Transport Company, Inc., Debtor. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Union Entities, (Two Cases). Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Be-Mac Transport Company, Inc., and the Plan Committee, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Be-Mac Transport Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996