Legal Opinion
Dunlop v. New Hampshire Jockey Club, Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided September 29, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-145PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOWNES, District Judge.
The Department of Labor alleges that the defendants have willfully violated the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (the Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., by failing to pay their employees time and one-half for hours worked in excess of forty hours per week for the years 1973 and 1974.
The defendants admit that in certain instances employees have not received time and one-half for hours worked in excess of forty per week, but claim that they are exempt from the overtime provisions of the Act by virtue of 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(3)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Arthur Coleman v. Jiffy June Farms, Inc., James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Jiffy June Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Brennan v. HeardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- F. Ray Marshall, Etc. v. The New Hampshire Jockey Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Hicks v. Communications Counselors Network, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1978