Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 2013PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered February 23, 2012, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff failed to sufficiently allege a cause of action under the State and City Human Rights Laws (see Executive Law § 296; Administrative Code of the City of New York § 8-107; cf. Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140 [1st Dept 2009]). There is no dispute that because plaintiff was not reinstated as a police officer until…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vig v. New York Hairspray Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. McDowell v. North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Abe v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Petit v. Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  3. Petit v. Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  4. Abe v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Askin v. Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API