Legal Opinion

Wilson & Gandy, Inc. v. Cummings

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1933No. 4599PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

Plaintiff sued J. L. Cummings and wife on open account for groceries and other merchandise presumably for the use of their household. Cummings made a surrender in bankruptcy and no further action was taken against him. Mrs. Cummings did not answer. Judgment by default was entered against her and was in due eourse confirmed. She prosecutes appeal therefrom.

There is no note of evidence in the record. No statement of facts from the trial court was secured before taking appeal. The judgment is for the amount of the account sued on and contains the customary declaration that due…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mathews Bros. v. BerniusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  2. Craver v. GillespieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Lockett v. TobySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  4. Simon v. DuetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  5. Kohn v. WagnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. D. H. Holmes Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  2. Consolidation Loans, Inc. v. GuercioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Alpha v. AucoinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Rouchon v. RocamoraLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. D. H. Holmes Co. v. Van RyperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API