Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1987No. D.D. No. 87-6PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This court finds respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. The evidence presented illustrates that respondent, while the victim of uncontrolled alcoholism, did misuse client remuneration illegally and in a fashion which severely compromised client trust.

Accordingly, this court adopts the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years, one year of which is suspended. In addition, respondent is hereby placed on probation to last five years from the date of this decision during which time…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DodgeOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. DodgeOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. DodgeOhio Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API