Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Mead

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 15, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Pbooeedibg upon the judicial settlement of the accounts of exécutors.

1Opinion of the Court

Ketcham, S.—

The decedent, having an ordinary deposit account in a trust company, drew his check thereon to the order of his daughter for $20,000 and three days before his death delivered the same to her. She delivered it to her own bank, which, through its correspondent bank, collected it from the trust company on which it was drawn, but it was not paid until two days after the decedent’s death, and the amount then paid reached the hands of the payee.

The daughter is one of the executors, who claims in the present accounting that by the delivery of the check to her and its payment “ she became…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of StaceyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of MulliganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  2. In Re the Accounting of SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. In re the Estate of LudlamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. Fisher v. BagnellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. In re the Estate of EhlersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API