In re the Claim of Costanza

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 26, 1990, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant admitted that he felt "uneasy” being watched by a surveillance camera while he worked and that he rendered the camera inoperative by covering the lens with a piece of *413paper. He also conceded that he was aware that the camera was there for security reasons. Under the circumstances, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board was entitled to conclude…